delete delete delete...that's all you do.
Moderator: Gamemasters
delete delete delete...that's all you do.
Delete it again and ban his forum account?
Guess i'll continue then, this time can we have answers?
Guess i'll continue then, this time can we have answers?
Last edited by Liles on Fri Dec 15, 2006 9:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Garett Gwenour
- Posts: 2360
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:18 am
- Location: Is Roleplay in YOU ?
- Garett Gwenour
- Posts: 2360
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:18 am
- Location: Is Roleplay in YOU ?
He got the ban for his inappropriate bahaviour as you can all see in the log. Posting logs is not allowed, that is why the post got deleted. Please refrain from posting logs. The player was aware that this was an ooc discussion, as I informed him of that. He decided to play the clown and even brag with it. So the ban will not be lifted any more.
Also note that revealing a GMs player chars is forbidden. This has been done by posting the log. It only gets worse.
Also note that revealing a GMs player chars is forbidden. This has been done by posting the log. It only gets worse.
Last edited by Vilarion on Fri Dec 15, 2006 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Garett Gwenour
- Posts: 2360
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:18 am
- Location: Is Roleplay in YOU ?
- Dantagon Marescot
- Posts: 1948
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:38 am
- Location: Illarion Public Library
- Samantha Meryadeles
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 2:48 pm
- Contact:
'I agree with Ku'agor...strangely...
I have to pay him my respect that he sees this all so clear and logical.
and i am worried that others like Retlak speak of gm_abuse...everyone with a clear mind can see what he did wrong there...
1. he told ooc in an ic encounter with another char he wont fight with that char since he is pushed. that was the rulebreak of mixing ic and ooc.
2. later he fooled around and played the clown when he got questioned by a gm. a very stupid behaviour.
3. he posted the log and gave away with that the identity of a gm's player char. that is too a clear rulebreak, it is forbidden.
I have to pay him my respect that he sees this all so clear and logical.
and i am worried that others like Retlak speak of gm_abuse...everyone with a clear mind can see what he did wrong there...
1. he told ooc in an ic encounter with another char he wont fight with that char since he is pushed. that was the rulebreak of mixing ic and ooc.
2. later he fooled around and played the clown when he got questioned by a gm. a very stupid behaviour.
3. he posted the log and gave away with that the identity of a gm's player char. that is too a clear rulebreak, it is forbidden.
- Dantagon Marescot
- Posts: 1948
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:38 am
- Location: Illarion Public Library
- Garett Gwenour
- Posts: 2360
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:18 am
- Location: Is Roleplay in YOU ?
@Dantagon - I won't even respond anything to what your writing, it is painfully obvious what your going for mate and it is pretty sad because your not the first to go down that route.
Patric this is rich considering your the one telling my "informant" that Gerron has excellent sivlersteel, is pushed and he must be banned and infact you tried to convince my "informant" to post about gerron being pushed and needed to be banned. I wonder if you would be a snake in the grass for him as well?Samantha Meryadeles wrote:'I agree with Ku'agor...strangely...
I have to pay him my respect that he sees this all so clear and logical.
and i am worried that others like Retlak speak of gm_abuse...everyone with a clear mind can see what he did wrong there...
1. he told ooc in an ic encounter with another char he wont fight with that char since he is pushed. that was the rulebreak of mixing ic and ooc.
2. later he fooled around and played the clown when he got questioned by a gm. a very stupid behaviour.
3. he posted the log and gave away with that the identity of a gm's player char. that is too a clear rulebreak, it is forbidden.
Unless I'm misinformed, neither player took issue with that1. he told ooc in an ic encounter with another char he wont fight with that char since he is pushed. that was the rulebreak of mixing ic and ooc.
Oh, I didn't know you could recieve a permanent ban for joking, my mistake.2. later he fooled around and played the clown when he got questioned by a gm. a very stupid behaviour.
This 'no posting log' business is ridiculous. If it's against the rules, I'll direct you to the Quote of the Day thread to inform you who else should have their posts deleted, and their IP banned from the forum. Furthermore, he 'gave away' the indentity after his account had already been banned.3. he posted the log and gave away with that the identity of a gm's player char. that is too a clear rulebreak, it is forbidden.
What's most distressing about this is the lengths to which certain individuals went to censor it. There's a serious consideration here as to if there was GM abuse, and rather than deleting the offending log, and discussing it, the post was deleted completely, a second post was deleted completely, and Sam's IP was banned so he couldn't defend himself. That sort of behaviour is just silly.
- Dantagon Marescot
- Posts: 1948
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:38 am
- Location: Illarion Public Library
- The Returner
- Posts: 2437
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 8:34 pm
- Location: Turny For GM '12
Not me.Azuros wrote:The rules of the board forbid me from saying what I want to say
Get the smile off, or deal with it, you whining, sniveling, pathetic excuse for anything.
You have no reason to be unbanned, and for the rest of you, equally whiny little brats, the gm's can do whatever the hell they want, regardless of their posistion, in case you haven't noticed, we're guests in the game they help maintain.
So shut the hell up. Not even patric is this fucking lame
- Dantagon Marescot
- Posts: 1948
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:38 am
- Location: Illarion Public Library
Okay, different stand point now that I am calmer. We were discussing about the guy who got a three day suspension for leaving something that induced panic into an administrator in six period today. People thought that it was a little harsh. But he had done things in the past.
When you are ran on a ladder punishment system, if you have precursers, then they go to the next rung in the ladder. Everyone may say that the ban is unreasonable. But if he has had past instances of punishment, then maybe this is just the next rung in the ladder.
You may not like it. But the GM didn't like being mocked, and neither do I.
When you are ran on a ladder punishment system, if you have precursers, then they go to the next rung in the ladder. Everyone may say that the ban is unreasonable. But if he has had past instances of punishment, then maybe this is just the next rung in the ladder.
You may not like it. But the GM didn't like being mocked, and neither do I.
- Samantha Meryadeles
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 2:48 pm
- Contact:
Word. He is right.
You messed up, you messed up alot. And that after messing up alot in the past. So don't whine when you now get the bill for messing up and pissing of ,and fooling around with, GM's.
And stop sending your "clique" to defend you. They don't make themself a favour when defending you in such a clear and right desicion by a GM. They just make fools of themself.
You messed up, you messed up alot. And that after messing up alot in the past. So don't whine when you now get the bill for messing up and pissing of ,and fooling around with, GM's.
And stop sending your "clique" to defend you. They don't make themself a favour when defending you in such a clear and right desicion by a GM. They just make fools of themself.