Vote: Laws

General roleplaying - No OOC-posts, please! / Allgemeines Rollenspiel - Bitte keine OOC-Posts!

Moderator: Gamemasters

Post Reply
User avatar
Garett Gwenour
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:18 am
Location: Is Roleplay in YOU ?

Vote: Laws

Post by Garett Gwenour »

Here are some new votes. As always only citizens are allow to vote. Those exemp from voting are the Governor and Vice-Governor.

Issue: Should it be allowed for people to speak ill of another's race, insulting and showing bad behavior in town without consequence. Please vote if you think there should be consequence or not. And also please add a short note about what you think the recommended consequence is.

Agreeing means: You feel it is allowed to speak ill of another race, insult and show bad behavior in town.

Disagreeing means: you feel if anyone acts like that, consequences should be handed out.


Stephen Rothman
Governor of Trolls Bane
Last edited by Garett Gwenour on Thu May 11, 2006 2:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Cliu Beothach
Posts: 1932
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 2:07 am
Location: Leaving, in the oceans of the moon.

Post by Cliu Beothach »

I feel it should be. It is rediculous, not being able to express one's feelings. If I talk ill of someone, they still have the right to talk back to me.

~Brer Beothach~
User avatar
Jeanette
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 12:27 am
Location: I can smell the mines!

Post by Jeanette »

I don't think its very nice to say something bad about anyone in the first place. I've gotten pretty far in life without insulting anyone, but as it is I also think that we're all entitled to our opinions. If someone doesn't like me they can say so in any way they see fit, but I also am entitled not to have to listen.

Jeanette
User avatar
Gray
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:54 am

Post by Gray »

Hooray for totalitarianism!

*unsigned*
User avatar
Garett Gwenour
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:18 am
Location: Is Roleplay in YOU ?

Post by Garett Gwenour »

I believe in a Totalerant state there is no voting. You may go back into your hole now.

Stephen Rothman
User avatar
Lance Thunnigan
Posts: 1749
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:02 am
Location: The 918, OK

Post by Lance Thunnigan »

What kind of a dumbass vote IS this?
~GyB
User avatar
Poots
Posts: 892
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: On the run.

Post by Poots »

I should be allowed to speak my mind, I agree with this law.

~Allen~
User avatar
Samantha Meryadeles
Posts: 1879
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 2:48 pm
Contact:

Post by Samantha Meryadeles »

I fear many of you haven't read really what Mister Rothman wrote there. You all agreed that it should be allowed to insult everyone inside town and show bad behaviour, like immorality or spitting at other peoples.

You may overthink that, because if you agree that it is allowed to behave so you will agree on abasement of morality in the town. Is that really what you wishes?

To agree means it is allowed to behave bad and insult others, to not agree means it should be punished!

~Lady Samantha Meryadeles~
User avatar
NirAntae
Posts: 580
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 12:08 pm
Contact:

Post by NirAntae »

Samantha~

You are quite right that such behavoir is immoral, and it is wrong, and people should not behave in such a way.

However, laws should not be made to enforce any person's or group's morals upon all. That is not what governments are there for. You cannot even pretend to say that a government is based on the people, on freedom, if it begins to dictate people's morals, so long as those moral standards do not harm another person. And I am sorry, but wounding your oh-so-delicate 'honor' is not 'harming' you.

I am not a citizen of Troll's Bane, and thus have no vote, but this is at least something for those who can, to think about.

~Maggie Kemoc~
User avatar
xBaurusx
Posts: 678
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 12:17 am
Location: Epic post that way ------>

Post by xBaurusx »

I belive that you should be be able to speak of others to a cirtain extent. like only talking ill in private.. i do not belive people should be able to just walk around Trolls Bane speaking rubbish about people.
This should be kept to yourself or someone close by, not spread throughout the town.



Baurus
User avatar
Poots
Posts: 892
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: On the run.

Post by Poots »

I believe a man can do whatever he wants with his speech, as long as it's not summoning anything. someone insults you take it like a man.


~Allen~
User avatar
Daashi
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Australia

Post by Daashi »

To censor our words, our behaviour and even our thoughts, is not something I wish to vote one.

If someone has insulted a race and it has lead to hostilities, then they may with punished, but not because of what they said but because they had threatened the peace and Safety of Trolls Bane with they're careless words.

Keep the laws as they are. People should be able to judge what is wrong and what is right, in how they and others behave.

Sincerely
Leto Mahn

P.S - Governor, perhaps you should consider resigning your office before someone decides to take it from you.
User avatar
Gro'bul
Posts: 3901
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 9:22 am
Location: Farmer's Union
Contact:

Post by Gro'bul »

Firstly, be thankful this governor gives you a choice and a voice. Plenty others would simply chop off tongues than deal with the pig dung that spews from some mouths around here, and plenty more to make you wish you were dead than live the seeming eternity of one more day under their rule.

Gruesome realness aside.
I think spoken agressorness should not be openly accepted. Words provoking someone to attack and be punish for the attack is simple dishonorable. Walk outside, and be nice to the town and let the pool of blood be outside, we don't want our craftsman breaking an wrist after slipping on your removed guts.

I wholy disagree with this law.

Georgius
User avatar
Drex Thaendrak
Posts: 159
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 10:58 am
Location: Arrassena, Freefolk territory

Post by Drex Thaendrak »

Sorry, that I have to say that, but this is not a law, this is is an invitation to lock away everyone who says or does anything Governor Rothman or the guard do not like. It nowhere states what "bad behaviour" or "speaking ill" means. What norm are you going to judge this on? How can the citizens be sure you don't just change this norm to whatever mood you are on?
Allowing this law to pass through is the first step into giving away all your freedom and citizens rights. I am not a citizen of this town right now, but I am going to change this as soon as possible, seeing what kind of laws are voted upon here.
I ask all citizens with common sense to vote against this law.


Drex Thaendrak

Merchant and Pawnbroker
User avatar
Garett Gwenour
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:18 am
Location: Is Roleplay in YOU ?

Post by Garett Gwenour »

How could I possibly censor your thoughts ? Or your words ?

You all complain about the problems with orcs. Where do you think it stems from ? When you insult an orc like Drex did yesterday speaking ill of the orc's race, they will attack the town. If we do not tolerate the orcs, we do not treat them equally we will forever be at war.
There are some who would fear me to be a dictator of Trolls Bane. If you don't want anything done in this town, if you want no leadership instead anarchy make a vote I will leave happily. I spent my family's fortune on this town to ensure the city will get active constructors to build better walls, to fund the town guard, to make housing and to make sure shop owners are active. I spent the Knighthood I constructed here to make sure the city Trolls bane was defended and kept safe. And get no thanks. I bend over backwards to make sure criminals have rights and that trials can be held. I get no thanks.

Make the vote and I will leave.


Stephen Rothman
Governor of Trolls Bane
User avatar
Korwin
Posts: 911
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 4:05 am
Location: Switzerland

Post by Korwin »

I agree that slander is an area too sensitive to be dealt with by law. I find it unrealistic to think that these cases can routinely be fairly resolved, and further believe the enforcement of a 'no rude behaviour' law is a senseless expenditure of guard time and energy.

-Orren Padick
Post Reply