Show what wear on legs in description

Juliana D'cheyne · Post by **Juliana D'cheyne** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:48 pm

Whether the char wears nothing at the top and trousers, or no trousers, the legs aren't shown in the description. This would be nicer if there was one skirt for the female chars to wear, but would be nice to add anyway if possible.

Llama · Post by **Llama** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:50 pm

"She is wearing nothing at the top part of the body, neither at the bottom part. You turn blind".

I personally think that if we add this, It'll spam the screen very badly with the description

Juliana D'cheyne · Post by **Juliana D'cheyne** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:54 pm

"She wears nothing at the upper part of her body" is already in the description.

"She wears nothing on her chest, wears nothing on legs" almost the same words yet describes both.

"He wears nothing on his chest, wears trousers/leather leggings etc."

All about the same words.

Rhianna Morgan · Post by **Rhianna Morgan** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:05 pm

Good idea! Would be neat to know--- especially if we finally get skirts, because then we can also *show them to all*, hehe!

Avalyon el'Hattarr · Post by **Avalyon el'Hattarr** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:01 pm

Neah.. I say that women need to walk arround naked.

Juliana D'cheyne · Post by **Juliana D'cheyne** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:56 pm

Maybe not such a good idea after all? Now anyone can walk around without pants and no one will know

Avalyon el'Hattarr · Post by **Avalyon el'Hattarr** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:17 pm

I never wear pants

Lrmy · Post by **Lrmy** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:57 pm

I'm not sure you can write that one is not wearing pants in a small enough sentence that makes sense. The descriptions are already to long in many cases.

Tanistian_Kanea · Post by **Tanistian_Kanea** » Mon Sep 01, 2008 4:42 am

She wears nothing on upper or lower body.
She wears a yellow shirt and yellow trousers.
She wears nothing on her upper body and yellow trousers.
She wears a yellow shirt and nothing on her lower body.

with

she has blah blah blah at belt and blah blah in hands.

it gets long when you have what is at the belt and what is in the hands.

i like this idea.

Kaila Galathil Travinus · Mon Sep 01, 2008 5:09 am

If think too long could only list possibly two things in the belt?

Post by **Nitram** » Mon Sep 01, 2008 8:10 am

Currently you get more or less the same informations at examining and examining closely. That will be changed sooner or later. The content of the lower part of the body will be shown then.

Nitram