banned?

[Julius]

I acted unfriendly? I never used cuss words or brash words. I simply made a topic for Dei to post in proclaiming he is wrong and for a gm answer. Sure, it shouldn't have been public, but tell me where in those posts I was hostile. I never flamed a gm or said that he was bad. I simply stated that he acted rash.

Now, for you to tell me 3 different reasons now after I have been banned for 1 reason smells a bit fishy. I was banned for a mistaken identify, now you tell me because I made a arguments with most people who started it and made a unfriendly thread. Wow, you must really want me banned.

[Kevin Lightdot]

I love it how highly "Freedom of speech" is thought about once there are oppinions different to those of some people around.

Might a mod step in and scold some people off for once?

I am sick of getting a "No, that's bullshit" for nearly every post I make, always coming from the same group of "english-speaking-players-of-diversified-nationalities INC"

When did I last say "No, that's crap." to you?

Also, I'm sick of getting "Omg u r a pking pger that spoils the game.", so we're even.

[Kamilar]

I am sick of getting a "No, that's bullshit" for nearly every post I make, always coming from the same group of "english-speaking-players-of-diversified-nationalities INC"

That hurt my feelings hun. Is that a personal thing?

[Lrmy]

I acted unfriendly? I never used cuss words or brash words. I simply made a topic for Dei to post in proclaiming he is wrong and for a gm answer. Sure, it shouldn't have been public, but tell me where in those posts I was hostile. I never flamed a gm or said that he was bad. I simply stated that he acted rash.

Now, for you to tell me 3 different reasons now after I have been banned for 1 reason smells a bit fishy. I was banned for a mistaken identify, now you tell me because I made a arguments with most people who started it and made a unfriendly thread. Wow, you must really want me banned.

They do. But, that's not the point. You are clearly not Raheem. Though, he, meaning Raheem, has logged onto Julius and played him in the past. I think you took the ban rather well. They banned you for mistaken identity without confirming it. It's like "We can't jail you because you stole, we have no proof. But, we will do it because you might have." Then you curse at the warden and they say "Well, maybe we were wrong but you made upset us in front of the entire jail so we will keep you here."

Who acts friendly to some one they will never meet in person when they are not treaded friendly by that person?

I am sick of getting a "No, that's bullshit" for nearly every post I make, always coming from the same group of "english-speaking-players-of-diversified-nationalities INC"

That is grouping a large(half) part of the community into one group. That IS bullshit. That IS dumb. You make narrow-minded posts that offend people. Sorry to be crude but it is true.

[Nitram]

Due the statement of Deinarious, that is was his misstake to name Julius with the name of Grant, the only real reason for the ban is invalid. So the ban upon Julius is lifted.

I'd like to to add, that this topic is rather insufficient to solve such a discussable problem. And a private discussion by PM could solve the case much faster.

The desicion to lift the ban bases upon the fact that the reason for the ban was invalid. The unneccessary statements in that topic by everyone but Julius and Deinarious raised the time that was needed to make that desicion. Discussion upon topics like this one, never end up good.

Nitram