Dear Runewickans,
It has been quite some time since the wall and the gate at the city entrance were erected. As part of this project, a gate was also built in front of the teleporter. I cannot find any written record of a decision regarding this gate at the teleporter, but I recall that the purpose of this gate was already being questioned back then. It was said at the time that this gate was only a temporary measure and was to be removed later.
Quite some time has now passed, and during this time it has become clear that this gate in front of the teleporter can be a real trap. To make matters worse, the charging of spatial magic at the teleporter has become noticeably slower, maybe due to changes in rune magic. Nevertheless, this so-called temporary measure was never removed, and no steps toward a permanent solution were in sight.
I have been approached on multiple occasions by citizens of other cities who have told me they avoid teleporting to Runewick because of this.
Therefore I would like to take action and make the teleporter in front of Runewick safe again.
I intend to implement this plan in three steps:
1. Immediate demolition of the gate in front of the teleporter, no postponement!
2. Creation of one or two additional access points to the teleporter island to serve as potential escape routes (bridges or dams)
3. Assessment of whether the teleporter can be relocated toward the city entrance, and if possible, implementation of this measure as a permanent solution.
Regarding step 1, the demolition of the gate in front of the teleporter, I ask energetic volunteers to gather in advance on the 15th of Ronas 78 at the hour 15 with the appropriate tools. I will personally provide appropriate refreshments for the volunteers.
Regarding the proposals for steps 2 and 3, I have already consulted the expert council of Malchus.
Malchus supports the proposals and has added his own suggestions; he considers the implementation of the steps mentioned to be sensible.
To discuss the steps 2 and 3 and their implementation, I invite you to a meeting in Runewick shortly.
Best regards
Asphy
Runewicks Teleporter
Moderators: Elvaine Morgan, Gamemasters
Re: Runewicks Teleporter
Minutes of the meeting in Runewick on 3 Eldas in the year 78
Subject: The Teleporter of Runewick
Several committed citizens of Runewick attended the meeting. Nalcaryos had sent word in advance that he was unable to attend.
Interested citizens from Cadomyr and Galmair also attended.
Initially, as next stage of the teleporter measures, short-term feasible solutions to improve the safety issue with the teleporter island were proposed and discussed.
None of those present objected in principle to the measures in general.
The following proposals were made and discussed:
- Removing the hedge on the teleporter island
- Filling in the moat around the teleporter island
- Building one or more bridges to the neighbouring island.
The issue of the hedge was not discussed further as it is seen as a short-term solution that can be implemented quickly if necessary.
The other two proposals were discussed and put to a vote, resulting in a tie.
It was decided to include Nalcaryos in the vote retrospectively, as the issue is also important to him, but he was unable to attend.
Nalcaryos has since been consulted, and after some consideration, he opted for the bridge solution, as these can be more easily dismantled if necessary.
In conjunction with this proposal as a provisional solution, a request is to be submitted to the Archmage to relocate the Runewick teleporter to the vicinity of the towns entrance. Here too, there were no objections to the measure itself, but some concerns that need to be clarified before we consult the Archmage.
The following points were also raised and must be taken into account in further planning:
- Instead of a temporary improvement to the security of the teleporter island, all resources should be focused on relocating the teleporter in order to complete the implementation by the next Mas.(all)
- After the implementation, the teleporter’s current location must remain accessible as a portal destination until there are no longer any existing portal books to Runewick in circulation. (mages)
- A suggestion to build a ‘watermill’ on the teleporter island hinted at a communal use, alluding to the past Rumormil Party in Runewick. In practical terms, this means an open-air gathering place should be created there, for which, of course, filling in the water ditch would be beneficial to the teleporters island. (all)
An attempt should be made to contact a mage named Rhaindierne, who is considered an expert in teleportation magic (Asphyxine)
A new date will be announced shortly for further discussion regarding the approach and refinement of the proposal to the Archmage (Asphyxine)
Written by Asphyxine; if I have forgotten anything or misunderstood, please let me know
Subject: The Teleporter of Runewick
Several committed citizens of Runewick attended the meeting. Nalcaryos had sent word in advance that he was unable to attend.
Interested citizens from Cadomyr and Galmair also attended.
Initially, as next stage of the teleporter measures, short-term feasible solutions to improve the safety issue with the teleporter island were proposed and discussed.
None of those present objected in principle to the measures in general.
The following proposals were made and discussed:
- Removing the hedge on the teleporter island
- Filling in the moat around the teleporter island
- Building one or more bridges to the neighbouring island.
The issue of the hedge was not discussed further as it is seen as a short-term solution that can be implemented quickly if necessary.
The other two proposals were discussed and put to a vote, resulting in a tie.
It was decided to include Nalcaryos in the vote retrospectively, as the issue is also important to him, but he was unable to attend.
Nalcaryos has since been consulted, and after some consideration, he opted for the bridge solution, as these can be more easily dismantled if necessary.
In conjunction with this proposal as a provisional solution, a request is to be submitted to the Archmage to relocate the Runewick teleporter to the vicinity of the towns entrance. Here too, there were no objections to the measure itself, but some concerns that need to be clarified before we consult the Archmage.
The following points were also raised and must be taken into account in further planning:
- Instead of a temporary improvement to the security of the teleporter island, all resources should be focused on relocating the teleporter in order to complete the implementation by the next Mas.(all)
- After the implementation, the teleporter’s current location must remain accessible as a portal destination until there are no longer any existing portal books to Runewick in circulation. (mages)
- A suggestion to build a ‘watermill’ on the teleporter island hinted at a communal use, alluding to the past Rumormil Party in Runewick. In practical terms, this means an open-air gathering place should be created there, for which, of course, filling in the water ditch would be beneficial to the teleporters island. (all)
An attempt should be made to contact a mage named Rhaindierne, who is considered an expert in teleportation magic (Asphyxine)
A new date will be announced shortly for further discussion regarding the approach and refinement of the proposal to the Archmage (Asphyxine)
Written by Asphyxine; if I have forgotten anything or misunderstood, please let me know
Re: Runewicks Teleporter
Dear Asphyxine,
As a fellow citizen of Runewick, I would first like to thank you for your initiative in organizing the recent meeting and for taking the time to document and share its minutes. Providing this level of transparency is both helpful and appreciated, particularly for those of us who were unable to attend.
I would, however, like to offer a few constructive reflections on the approach taken. While I personally find the proposed outcomes reasonable, I believe it is still important to consider the broader process by which they were reached. In particular, reliance on in-person attendance as the primary means of participation may unintentionally limit opportunities for all citizens to contribute their perspectives. Runewick, as I understand it, is founded on principles of learning, inclusivity, and fairness - values that are best upheld when all citizens are given a reasonable opportunity to be heard and give their vote on matters such as these.
With that in mind, I would like to suggest a few potential improvements for future discussions of this nature:
1. Attendance
The minutes note that several citizens attended, including visitors from Cadomyr and Galmair. Expanding this to include the names of those present would be helpful to allow us to know how representative the discussion may have been.
2. Broader Participation Before Final Decisions
The discussion and development of proposals during the meeting appear to have been thoughtful and productive. However while the sharing of meeting minutes is a valuable step toward transparency and does provide an opportunity for others to review what has been discussed, the way in which the outcomes are presented can influence how open that opportunity appears. In this case, the inclusion of a concluded vote - subsequently resolved through retrospective input - may give the impression that decisions have already been finalized, rather than still being open for broader participation.
It may therefore be helpful to more clearly distinguish between preliminary outcomes from a meeting and decisions that are still open for wider input. Presenting such results as provisional, pending a period of community feedback, could encourage greater engagement and help ensure that all citizens feel they have an equal opportunity to contribute before matters are settled.
Towards this purpose it may be beneficial to share proposals publicly, ideally with drawings for any building projects as has been the case in the past, for a set period - perhaps around a dwarven week - so that those unable to attend can review, provide input, and in an informed manner participate in the decision-making process. This would help ensure broader engagement while still maintaining a clear and timely progression of matters.
I understand that a follow-up meeting is planned to refine the proposal to the Archmage. However, as this format remains dependent on availability, it may still unintentionally limit participation. As such, a parallel opportunity for written input could further strengthen the process.
3. Engagement with Appointed Leadership
It is appreciated that an effort was made to consult Doctor Nalcaryos despite his absence. However, this also raises a broader question regarding how input is sought from citizens who are not present. To ensure consistency and fairness, it may be beneficial to establish a more uniform approach - either by extending the same opportunity for input to all absent citizens, or by reserving such follow-up consultation for those formally entrusted with decision-making responsibilities, which to my present knowledge would be Probationary Councilor Caswir Drakull.
Clarifying this distinction could help avoid any perception of unequal weighting of individual voices and reinforce confidence in the inclusivity of the process. In this context, it may also be helpful to ensure that individuals currently holding formally appointed roles - such as Probationary Councilor Caswir Drakull - are included in or consulted during such discussions where appropriate. Indicating whether he was present, or whether his perspective has been or will be sought, would further support transparency and help keep the wider community informed.
___
I hope these suggestions are received in the constructive spirit in which they are intended. My aim is simply to support a process that reflects the inclusive and collaborative values that define Runewick as a place of learning.
Respectfully,
Scholar Teagan Everlowe, Runewickian Alchemist
As a fellow citizen of Runewick, I would first like to thank you for your initiative in organizing the recent meeting and for taking the time to document and share its minutes. Providing this level of transparency is both helpful and appreciated, particularly for those of us who were unable to attend.
I would, however, like to offer a few constructive reflections on the approach taken. While I personally find the proposed outcomes reasonable, I believe it is still important to consider the broader process by which they were reached. In particular, reliance on in-person attendance as the primary means of participation may unintentionally limit opportunities for all citizens to contribute their perspectives. Runewick, as I understand it, is founded on principles of learning, inclusivity, and fairness - values that are best upheld when all citizens are given a reasonable opportunity to be heard and give their vote on matters such as these.
With that in mind, I would like to suggest a few potential improvements for future discussions of this nature:
1. Attendance
The minutes note that several citizens attended, including visitors from Cadomyr and Galmair. Expanding this to include the names of those present would be helpful to allow us to know how representative the discussion may have been.
2. Broader Participation Before Final Decisions
The discussion and development of proposals during the meeting appear to have been thoughtful and productive. However while the sharing of meeting minutes is a valuable step toward transparency and does provide an opportunity for others to review what has been discussed, the way in which the outcomes are presented can influence how open that opportunity appears. In this case, the inclusion of a concluded vote - subsequently resolved through retrospective input - may give the impression that decisions have already been finalized, rather than still being open for broader participation.
It may therefore be helpful to more clearly distinguish between preliminary outcomes from a meeting and decisions that are still open for wider input. Presenting such results as provisional, pending a period of community feedback, could encourage greater engagement and help ensure that all citizens feel they have an equal opportunity to contribute before matters are settled.
Towards this purpose it may be beneficial to share proposals publicly, ideally with drawings for any building projects as has been the case in the past, for a set period - perhaps around a dwarven week - so that those unable to attend can review, provide input, and in an informed manner participate in the decision-making process. This would help ensure broader engagement while still maintaining a clear and timely progression of matters.
I understand that a follow-up meeting is planned to refine the proposal to the Archmage. However, as this format remains dependent on availability, it may still unintentionally limit participation. As such, a parallel opportunity for written input could further strengthen the process.
3. Engagement with Appointed Leadership
It is appreciated that an effort was made to consult Doctor Nalcaryos despite his absence. However, this also raises a broader question regarding how input is sought from citizens who are not present. To ensure consistency and fairness, it may be beneficial to establish a more uniform approach - either by extending the same opportunity for input to all absent citizens, or by reserving such follow-up consultation for those formally entrusted with decision-making responsibilities, which to my present knowledge would be Probationary Councilor Caswir Drakull.
Clarifying this distinction could help avoid any perception of unequal weighting of individual voices and reinforce confidence in the inclusivity of the process. In this context, it may also be helpful to ensure that individuals currently holding formally appointed roles - such as Probationary Councilor Caswir Drakull - are included in or consulted during such discussions where appropriate. Indicating whether he was present, or whether his perspective has been or will be sought, would further support transparency and help keep the wider community informed.
___
I hope these suggestions are received in the constructive spirit in which they are intended. My aim is simply to support a process that reflects the inclusive and collaborative values that define Runewick as a place of learning.
Respectfully,
Scholar Teagan Everlowe, Runewickian Alchemist
Re: Runewicks Teleporter
Dear Teagan,
Thank you very much for your message.
As regards the format of the minutes and the naming of individuals, it may become clear from my reply that this is not a set of official council minutes, but rather an initiative. In any case, I am not authorised to keep official council records.
I agree with you that a broader consultation would have provided a more accurate picture of public opinion. And yes, in my view too few interested Runewickers attended the meeting.
I believe that the date and agenda of the meeting were announced early enough for people to make arrangements. However, only Nalcaryos had sent an apology prior to the meeting, which I announced at the meeting.
Of the aforementioned public representatives of Runewick, Cartaphylus was present.
As for a written survey, people would also need to have their say by a deadline. A retrospective survey would be a potentially endless endeavour, and there would be a risk that the project would fall apart.
The meeting and the vote were organised as a petition to be addressed to the Archmage. Any individual can do that on their own. This vote was not a decision on implementation, but on the content of the petition’s proposal. The decision lies with the Archmage or the Council.
I dare say that I am well acquainted with the statutes of Runewick, and I am not aware of any formal requirements for the drafting and submission of a proposal or petition. Any further contributions, including sketches, are welcome.
It is possible that the Archmage will reject this proposal on formal grounds, and it may well have been my mistake for not having mobilised enough citizens.
I will therefore consider how to encourage more people to come forward or get in touch in future.
As for formalism, however, it is my personal opinion that formalism serves itself rather than the cause. But please don’t judge me for it.
Best regards,
Asphy
Thank you very much for your message.
As regards the format of the minutes and the naming of individuals, it may become clear from my reply that this is not a set of official council minutes, but rather an initiative. In any case, I am not authorised to keep official council records.
I agree with you that a broader consultation would have provided a more accurate picture of public opinion. And yes, in my view too few interested Runewickers attended the meeting.
I believe that the date and agenda of the meeting were announced early enough for people to make arrangements. However, only Nalcaryos had sent an apology prior to the meeting, which I announced at the meeting.
Of the aforementioned public representatives of Runewick, Cartaphylus was present.
As for a written survey, people would also need to have their say by a deadline. A retrospective survey would be a potentially endless endeavour, and there would be a risk that the project would fall apart.
The meeting and the vote were organised as a petition to be addressed to the Archmage. Any individual can do that on their own. This vote was not a decision on implementation, but on the content of the petition’s proposal. The decision lies with the Archmage or the Council.
I dare say that I am well acquainted with the statutes of Runewick, and I am not aware of any formal requirements for the drafting and submission of a proposal or petition. Any further contributions, including sketches, are welcome.
It is possible that the Archmage will reject this proposal on formal grounds, and it may well have been my mistake for not having mobilised enough citizens.
I will therefore consider how to encourage more people to come forward or get in touch in future.
As for formalism, however, it is my personal opinion that formalism serves itself rather than the cause. But please don’t judge me for it.
Best regards,
Asphy
Re: Runewicks Teleporter
Dear fellow citizens and friends of Runewick,
At Teagan’s suggestion - and in light of the opportunity for public input he mentioned regarding the drafting of the proposal for the teleporter - I would like to invite you to share your opinions and suggestions on this board. You may do so in writing or, if you prefer, through sketches.
I ask that you take advantage of this opportunity by Irmas 14, 78. ((19.April))
Best regards
Asphy
((I'll be traveling from April 13 to 19 and won't be able to play online))
At Teagan’s suggestion - and in light of the opportunity for public input he mentioned regarding the drafting of the proposal for the teleporter - I would like to invite you to share your opinions and suggestions on this board. You may do so in writing or, if you prefer, through sketches.
I ask that you take advantage of this opportunity by Irmas 14, 78. ((19.April))
Best regards
Asphy
((I'll be traveling from April 13 to 19 and won't be able to play online))
Re: Runewicks Teleporter
For the perusal of my fellow citizen, I put forth my own opinions and suggestions on the matter.
I agree that the teleporter island as it is continues to pose a risk to the safety of our citizen and visitors alike, especially during Mas.
For a short term goal I believe removing the two hedges closest to the entrance, as per miss Lyrica Blue's suggestion during the previous removal of the gate there, is the most reasonable approach as it can be done on relatively short notice with little effort while opening the area up to be less of a choking point should there be a dangerous situation.
For an interim goal to take place before Mas, I believe building a bridge from the island to the larger Runewick peninsula to its east is the most reasonable approach. As such I find myself concurring with the votes that were already given in majority there, as the reason that it can be easily dismantled is sound. Although if we as citizen of Runewick were to be presented with a drawing of what it might look like if we fill the moat instead, I would not look away from such a permanent solution entirely - especially if it ends up being the case that moving the teleporter is not possible after all.
For a long term goal, moving the teleporter to be closer to the town gates akin to the gates of our neighboring realms and their teleporters, has my full support. Should it turn out to involve not just arcane magic but that of alchemy, then I shall of course volunteer my services in whichever way I can. I will also do my best to attend the next meeting on the matter in-person. For the location I would suggest using the following sketch as a basis, which is a copy of a sketch that was previously put forth by our former Guard Captain, Malchus, and then amended by me to include the addition of a side gate and some slight relocation of the sitting area. For the reasoning given, both for the original sketch and the amendments I made, I refer to the archives for the board posts made back then on the topic. With this as a basis I would suggest amending the sketch another time to include a new teleporter.
It is my hope we will bear in mind not just safety concerns, but also day to day functionality and use for the farmers and passing citizen/visitors, as well as aesthetics, when going about the proposal that is to be sent to the Archmage.
I would also like to take this chance to as a fellow citizen once more thank Asphyxine for the initiative taken and effort she has put into and keeps putting into ensuring this happens.
Respectfully,
Scholar Teagan Everlowe, Runewickian Alchemist
I agree that the teleporter island as it is continues to pose a risk to the safety of our citizen and visitors alike, especially during Mas.
For a short term goal I believe removing the two hedges closest to the entrance, as per miss Lyrica Blue's suggestion during the previous removal of the gate there, is the most reasonable approach as it can be done on relatively short notice with little effort while opening the area up to be less of a choking point should there be a dangerous situation.
For an interim goal to take place before Mas, I believe building a bridge from the island to the larger Runewick peninsula to its east is the most reasonable approach. As such I find myself concurring with the votes that were already given in majority there, as the reason that it can be easily dismantled is sound. Although if we as citizen of Runewick were to be presented with a drawing of what it might look like if we fill the moat instead, I would not look away from such a permanent solution entirely - especially if it ends up being the case that moving the teleporter is not possible after all.
For a long term goal, moving the teleporter to be closer to the town gates akin to the gates of our neighboring realms and their teleporters, has my full support. Should it turn out to involve not just arcane magic but that of alchemy, then I shall of course volunteer my services in whichever way I can. I will also do my best to attend the next meeting on the matter in-person. For the location I would suggest using the following sketch as a basis, which is a copy of a sketch that was previously put forth by our former Guard Captain, Malchus, and then amended by me to include the addition of a side gate and some slight relocation of the sitting area. For the reasoning given, both for the original sketch and the amendments I made, I refer to the archives for the board posts made back then on the topic. With this as a basis I would suggest amending the sketch another time to include a new teleporter.
It is my hope we will bear in mind not just safety concerns, but also day to day functionality and use for the farmers and passing citizen/visitors, as well as aesthetics, when going about the proposal that is to be sent to the Archmage.
I would also like to take this chance to as a fellow citizen once more thank Asphyxine for the initiative taken and effort she has put into and keeps putting into ensuring this happens.
Respectfully,
Scholar Teagan Everlowe, Runewickian Alchemist
Re: Runewicks Teleporter
I hate to break the bad news, we are unable to relocate the teleporter, as the current placement concise with the mana lines. We have proposed it in the past and were unable to.
What is possible and achievable is a gate, like the one pictured above.
Two we could build the land outward from its current place, expanding the room we have there and giving better escape routes.
We fixed the damaged bridge, we could even build more yellow brick.
Remember some live in Yewdale, so it is a way there also.
This is a real problem I believe also. As Ive seen it myself.
-Academic Council member, Caswir Drakull
What is possible and achievable is a gate, like the one pictured above.
Two we could build the land outward from its current place, expanding the room we have there and giving better escape routes.
We fixed the damaged bridge, we could even build more yellow brick.
Remember some live in Yewdale, so it is a way there also.
This is a real problem I believe also. As Ive seen it myself.
-Academic Council member, Caswir Drakull
Re: Runewicks Teleporter
So now Ive drawn up an idea. This would take realistically a days worth of work if we work together. We'll need bricks for sure. Here is a blueprint of my idea:
I hearby propose we build this blueprint and the one Teagan has made above.
If everyone agrees, we will take initiative to build.
-Academic Council Member, Caswir Drakull
I hearby propose we build this blueprint and the one Teagan has made above.
If everyone agrees, we will take initiative to build.
-Academic Council Member, Caswir Drakull
Re: Runewicks Teleporter
Dear fellow citizens,
thank you very much for your subsequent thoughts, information and suggestions.
To ensure we stay on track and take into account the outcomes of the discussion so far, I invite you to bring these thoughts and suggestions to the next meeting.
I will post the invitation on the board shortly.
Best regards, Asphy
thank you very much for your subsequent thoughts, information and suggestions.
To ensure we stay on track and take into account the outcomes of the discussion so far, I invite you to bring these thoughts and suggestions to the next meeting.
I will post the invitation on the board shortly.
Best regards, Asphy