A rant about wrestling
Moderator: Gamemasters
- Taliss Kazzxs
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:47 am
- Contact:
- Korm Kormsen
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 5:46 pm
- Location: Illarion nordpol, wenns den gibt...
combat...
i got some training, when i was still young and fit.
silas, you are right, there are tecniques, to win unarmed against most melee weapons.
but who knows them? more than 5% of a given population?
for the average knife wealder a good and timed kick at the wrist, and thats it.
but allready a rambo or dundee knife gives your opponent a longer radius of action.
the opponent using a cleaver or a machete, everybody, short of the higher dans, needs at least a broomstick or a chair to get in unharmed.
i never fought a swordsman, but, really, i am not eager, to try.
so concluding from RL to the game:
if the armed Noob is not very handicapped in agility or something similar, only a very bright yellow wrestler should be able to survive such a fight.
korm
i got some training, when i was still young and fit.
silas, you are right, there are tecniques, to win unarmed against most melee weapons.
but who knows them? more than 5% of a given population?
for the average knife wealder a good and timed kick at the wrist, and thats it.
but allready a rambo or dundee knife gives your opponent a longer radius of action.
the opponent using a cleaver or a machete, everybody, short of the higher dans, needs at least a broomstick or a chair to get in unharmed.
i never fought a swordsman, but, really, i am not eager, to try.
so concluding from RL to the game:
if the armed Noob is not very handicapped in agility or something similar, only a very bright yellow wrestler should be able to survive such a fight.
korm
But in real life there are places where you can not bring weapons. Drawing a weapon takes time, it is a lot easier to fight unarmed on tight places. You often have the benefit of surprise attacks.
Allso there are ways to make somone faint with a single touch.
You can hit somone with the inside of the palm, wich is just as efective as hiting with a cleched fist, but in a court you would get away with it rather well, as witnesses could say you did not even clench your fists. If you did the same thing with a knife or sword...
However, these things are hard to represent ingame, so unarmed fighters should get some other benefits instead?
Allso there are ways to make somone faint with a single touch.
You can hit somone with the inside of the palm, wich is just as efective as hiting with a cleched fist, but in a court you would get away with it rather well, as witnesses could say you did not even clench your fists. If you did the same thing with a knife or sword...
However, these things are hard to represent ingame, so unarmed fighters should get some other benefits instead?
disagreed. for one thing techniques for disarming enemies are common in every martial art, and most simple self defense courses have them.
been training i several forms of martial arts since i was a wee little one (i was five). and swing plenty of sword to know that you can't just flick your wrist back and forth and expect to get enough cutting power to go through someones limbs, you have to put actual swing effort into it, and when you miss you don't suddenly just give alittle twist and bring the blade the other way. swords are more encumbering then you think they are.
there are to many variables in combat to say who will win each and every time. regardless of a weapon, all it takes is one mistake and things can change immensely.
been training i several forms of martial arts since i was a wee little one (i was five). and swing plenty of sword to know that you can't just flick your wrist back and forth and expect to get enough cutting power to go through someones limbs, you have to put actual swing effort into it, and when you miss you don't suddenly just give alittle twist and bring the blade the other way. swords are more encumbering then you think they are.
there are to many variables in combat to say who will win each and every time. regardless of a weapon, all it takes is one mistake and things can change immensely.
Martial arts is as effective as people think the problem is most people aren't as effective as the martial arts they use. Alot of times especially when you look at chinese martial arts (which has alot of family based styles) for example, styles of martial arts are based on a certain body types or particular ranges, reaches or types of motion really don't work for most people. Which is why you have black belts who still get the crap kicked out of them after ten years of training.Cuthalion wrote:There is a reason why weapons are used. Somone dueling an armed fighter, and is unarmed himself would have a very small chance. Somone good unarmed have as I said other advantages instead.
Martial arts are not as efective as most think, the bigest benefit is that it makes you strong.
Great martial artists are very rare. black belts who suck (like america and it's mc'donalds approach to martial arts) are like water in a ocean.
As you know they exist, I supose you know one?;) There is a league for this these fighting arts. First place I think, is something called Crow Maga. Wich is from somwhere in europe. Seckond is plain boxing...
This is just like people thinking that asian katanas (I know katna simply mens sword, but you know what I mean) were so much more efective than european longswords, wich is not true.
The grass of your neighbour is allways greener...
This is just like people thinking that asian katanas (I know katna simply mens sword, but you know what I mean) were so much more efective than european longswords, wich is not true.
The grass of your neighbour is allways greener...
- Taeryon Silverlight
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:35 pm
- Contact:
- Mr. Cromwell
- Posts: 1876
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: All over the place.