Dear GMs
Moderator: Gamemasters
-
Bumbol Woodstock
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:54 am
- Location: somewhere between here and there
- Contact:
-
Bumbol Woodstock
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:54 am
- Location: somewhere between here and there
- Contact:
-
Bumbol Woodstock
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:54 am
- Location: somewhere between here and there
- Contact:
who exactly.
The main point of the topic, the question of Matholamew was solved. At the same time the question of Aegohl i think.
Are there any more questions, i did not answer with my answer post to Aegohl?
Nitram
---------------- EDIT -----------------
So i sometimes really roleplay with this character.
Nitram
The main point of the topic, the question of Matholamew was solved. At the same time the question of Aegohl i think.
Are there any more questions, i did not answer with my answer post to Aegohl?
Nitram
---------------- EDIT -----------------
The leading lich of the "Lich wars" was the character "Nitram" That was the reason he had no real name.Bumbol Woodstock wrote:I was not aware you roleplayed often, or at all, on nitram.
So i sometimes really roleplay with this character.
Nitram
Last edited by Nitram on Mon Jan 01, 2007 2:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Cliu Beothach
- Posts: 1932
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 2:07 am
- Location: Leaving, in the oceans of the moon.
-
Damien
- Posts: 7845
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2001 5:59 pm
- Location: Vanima and grey Refuge, of course.
- Contact:
Sams ban was a decision of the WHOLE STAFF after a long discussion, listing many facts and things concerning habits and fall-back into old habits repeatedly after promising not to do so, and much other stuff. That means :
THE WHOLE STAFF stands behind this decision.
That's all, it has nothing to do with personal likings / dislikings, and it will not be taken back.
Sams words defining his rulebreakings as "lies" are nothing but an invented argument. If he would not have broken rules, he would not have been banned, and if he would not have done alike repeatedly and after having had several "last chances" a while ago, the ban would not have been permanent.
So let's make it clear :
- It is a whole staff decision. Not a personal decision.
- no argument, no complaining, no false accuse on GM-abuse will change it
- the game will not end because sam cannot play anymore.
I know that Sam can roleplay, the other staff members know that too, and i always find it sad if a player has to be removed from the game who can roleplay, which was the only reason why i spoke for him the last time. Brought to the point, he quickly broke the promise he gave me and the staff back then, as well as the conditions for his "very last chance" back then. Because of this and because of his late postings revealing that his "sorry" post was not really meant as it was written, i fully support the permanent ban decision.
That's all i have to say.
THE WHOLE STAFF stands behind this decision.
That's all, it has nothing to do with personal likings / dislikings, and it will not be taken back.
Sams words defining his rulebreakings as "lies" are nothing but an invented argument. If he would not have broken rules, he would not have been banned, and if he would not have done alike repeatedly and after having had several "last chances" a while ago, the ban would not have been permanent.
So let's make it clear :
- It is a whole staff decision. Not a personal decision.
- no argument, no complaining, no false accuse on GM-abuse will change it
- the game will not end because sam cannot play anymore.
I know that Sam can roleplay, the other staff members know that too, and i always find it sad if a player has to be removed from the game who can roleplay, which was the only reason why i spoke for him the last time. Brought to the point, he quickly broke the promise he gave me and the staff back then, as well as the conditions for his "very last chance" back then. Because of this and because of his late postings revealing that his "sorry" post was not really meant as it was written, i fully support the permanent ban decision.
That's all i have to say.
Last edited by Damien on Mon Jan 01, 2007 2:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
AND THAT SETLTLES IT! damien is like, a smart guy! knows waht hes tealking about so is the rest of gm team, otherwaise they eoulwdnty be gm team! so yeah, syop moaning. live with it. if his ban means so much to your character, that he cannot live on, DELETE HIM, and make a newo ne!? or youi lose trpecious skil;?
Damien, have the guts to tell the real things at least, Sam did not do any wrong doings in the past, it is clear the time he had gotten banned before was out of spite from you and it is why he got unbanned by the majority of the GM's choices. So whatever, keep Sam banned and ignore how many players you want to ignore, I will live with it, but get your fucking facts straight at least.
