I was not counteracting this right?Athian wrote:personally it's not a bad limitation i think. at least when it comes to actual objects and not constant objects like flowers and and patches of grass. it's an idea that makes sense to me.

Moderator: Gamemasters
I was not counteracting this right?Athian wrote:personally it's not a bad limitation i think. at least when it comes to actual objects and not constant objects like flowers and and patches of grass. it's an idea that makes sense to me.
No he wont post his stats. And to me, mages should be stronger than warriors, just not 10x, so please fucking read before posting what you think im thinking? Thanks, now stop talking about me god.falco1029 wrote:From the looks of it, arameh cant handle that warriors arent the most powerful thing around, and thinks mages shgoul;d be weakened so he can have his way. I have seen warriors take mages down 1 on 1 before, and usually they do. Warlocks, though, probably can learn a bit too much. Athian what are your stats if you dont mind posting them?
Well you didhnt type that way, and i didnt read every post, you ant expect me to, ir ead the last 2 or so. And dont speak for him, please.Arameh_ wrote:No he wont post his stats. And to me, mages should be stronger than warriors, just not 10x, so please fucking read before posting what you think im thinking? Thanks, now stop talking about me god.falco1029 wrote:From the looks of it, arameh cant handle that warriors arent the most powerful thing around, and thinks mages shgoul;d be weakened so he can have his way. I have seen warriors take mages down 1 on 1 before, and usually they do. Warlocks, though, probably can learn a bit too much. Athian what are your stats if you dont mind posting them?