Page 1 of 2
Read the news! / Lest die News!
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:01 pm
by Nitram
I know just a few do but this time everyone should. Read the news on the homepage!
----
Ich weis das es nur ein paar wenige tun, aber diesesmal sollten es all. Lest die Neuigkeiten auf der Homepage!
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:02 pm
by Alsaya
Im Zuge der neuen Regeln, haben wir nun auch neue Regeln bezüglich Gilden. Diese sind ausgereifter und vorallem umfassender. Aus diesem Grund werden alle Gilden gebeten die neuen Regeln durchzulesen und das erfoderliche Konzept an einen GM zu schicken. Sollte das Konzept nicht binnen einer Woche bei dem GM Team eingetroffen sein, gilt die Gilde als inaktiv, der zugehörige Thread im Gildenboard wird geschlossen und das Recht auf eventuelles Eigentum ingame verfällt.
Zur Zeit aktive GMs sind:
Arien Edhel
Zak
Vaun
Mesha
Naerwyn
Alsaya
-------------------------------------------
With the new rules, we also have now new rules concerning guilds. These are fully developed and especially more comprehensive. Due to this, we ask every guild to read those new rules and to send the needed concept to a GM. Should the concept not arrive the GM Team within one week, the guild is counted as inactive, the thread in the guildboard will be closed and the right on any property ingame expires.
Active GMs right now are:
Arien Edhel
Zak
Vaun
Mesha
Naerwyn
Alsaya
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:03 pm
by AlexRose
:/
I wish you wouldn't destroy stuff
Even if it isn't being used, it's still more interesting to have on the map than a featureless field of green, and at least it adds some history to the island and acts as a momento. Adding diversity and history encourages roleplay.
Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:28 pm
by rakust dorenstkzul
Call me nitpicky, but that rule you guys made about Pregnancy probation isn't on those lists.
Can i take it as though the rule's temporary?
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:56 am
by Alexander Knight
I agree... but some places you guys missed out.... Goldberg Kallahorn Caelum ((Even though you chased people out of goldberg with a crazy dwarf and golem))
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 10:06 am
by Mesha
Alexander Knight wrote:I agree... but some places you guys missed out.... Goldberg Kallahorn Caelum ((Even though you chased people out of goldberg with a crazy dwarf and golem))
What does this have to do with the rules?
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:44 am
by Alexander Knight
Oh sorry i read it wrong, i thought you said IF the guild is inactive for more than a week then land will be taken

Sorry

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:50 pm
by Nitram
The pregnancy rule got dropped again. In case its needed characters that play the pregnancy in a unfitting way, those will be handled one by one.
Nitram
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:35 pm
by Alexander Knight
Nitram wrote:The pregnancy rule got dropped again. In case its needed characters that play the pregnancy in a unfitting way, those will be handled one by one.
Nitram
PMSL Samara wont be too happy. She had to have a miscarrage 2 days before her due date
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:47 pm
by Nitram
So what? The rule was dropped NOW. It was valid before.
Nitram
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:22 pm
by 1d20
Nitram will be pregnant and I will be its offspring.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:30 am
by CJK
I've got a question on that age rule... if you are already an active player in the community you don't particuarly care that someone is under 16, do you? otherwise I'm in trouble

Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:37 am
by rakust dorenstkzul
ltgmkay wrote:I've got a question on that age rule... if you are already an active player in the community you don't particuarly care that someone is under 16, do you? otherwise I'm in trouble

I'm 12 and what is this
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:56 am
by Aldan Vian
rakust dorenstkzul wrote:ltgmkay wrote:I've got a question on that age rule... if you are already an active player in the community you don't particuarly care that someone is under 16, do you? otherwise I'm in trouble

I'm 12 and what is this
It says "recommended" age, and I think this has been around for a long time...
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:19 am
by wolfsword
ltgmkay wrote:I've got a question on that age rule... if you are already an active player in the community you don't particuarly care that someone is under 16, do you? otherwise I'm in trouble

Nah, otherwise I wouldn't be here,

Started when I was twelve like Raku as well, o.O
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:22 am
by Kranek
it has been here since i started the game ages ago

Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:49 pm
by AlexRose
That's ancient. It was even there when I started. I thought the reason was due to the gore and sexual scenes and stuff, but apparently they're banned now too >_>. They also had a rule against watching TV while ingame

.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:44 pm
by Damien
It is not there because of gore and sexual stuff !
Please keep in mind:
The reason why this game is recommended for players above 16 is that a player has to be able to act somewhat mature in a roleplaying game like this one in order not to drive other players out of it ! (and usually get banned after doing so).
In short : the younger a player is, the higher the chance that he behaves childish or stupid. The more childish or stupid a player behaves, the likelier is the chance that another game (for example:
www.hellokittyonline.com ) is suited much better for said player.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:54 pm
by Llama
Dude, its even free to play! Wish i had the time to try it
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:55 pm
by Damien
...n00b

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:15 pm
by CJK
heh so THAT is why it is good to read the rules when you join...

although I don't think that it is exactly true to expect everyone under 16 to be immature... or so i've been told

Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:57 pm
by Llama
ltgmkay wrote:heh so THAT is why it is good to read the rules when you join...

although I don't think that it is exactly true to expect everyone under 16 to be immature... or so i've been told

Nor is it true to expect everyone over 16 to be m
ature. We al
l like to think that th
ere is some e
xquisite_co
rrelati
on between the two, but it
seems this is not the cas
e.

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:05 am
by Arvemor
Well written! Bravo!
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:08 am
by AlexRose
;_;
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:16 am
by Arvemor
Lol, sorry Alex, I just thought it was funny. *opens his arms for a hug* Still friends?
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:00 am
by 1d20
Arvemor wrote:*opens his arms for a hug*
I'm his boyfriend and I get jealous.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:31 am
by Tanistian_Kanea
ok. this may seem redundant buuuuttt i'm going to ask anyway.
for those of us who may not have read the rules within the last year or so.... what changes where made?
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:38 am
by Vern Kron
Just go by the current rules. The past rules, obviously, are not in effect any longer.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:15 am
by Arvemor
MoonDust wrote:
I'm his boyfriend and I get jealous.
*Bitchslaps Moondust*
XD
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:33 am
by Ortrud
Eine genaueres Regelwerk finde ich sehr gut.
Aber ist es wirklich nötig, daß alle Gilder praktisch sofort ihr neues Konzept vorstellen?
Ich denke da sollte es einen zeitlich größeren Spielraum geben, es ist ja nicht so, daß alle Spieler
ständig Zeit haben.
Bitte überdenkt das mit der einen Woche nochmal.