Paralysis Times
Moderator: Gamemasters
- Galim
- Posts: 1843
- Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 1:01 am
- Location: Sitting and drinking at Irmoroms table
- Contact:
there was never a rule about "paralysing" before. yes, i casted paralyse more than one time in the past, but after i read falks posting i won't do it again. i haven't knew that it is forbidden. well, of course i haven't used it to kill someone. well, a question, does that means it is forbidden to cast more than one paralyse on monsters too?
- Falk vom Wald
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2002 10:22 am
- Location: Kloster Eldan, Trollsbane
I did not say it is forbidden. What I said came from my point of view. To paralize someone is part of magical warfare, sure. But to use it again and again against the same person just means to me, that the player does not want to interact with his opposite but simply use it for its technical effect.
If you are paralized you can't even talk. So the mage should give his opposite the possibility to act between two paralize spells, that what I wanted to say.
If you are paralized you can't even talk. So the mage should give his opposite the possibility to act between two paralize spells, that what I wanted to say.
-
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:46 pm
- Grant Herion
- Posts: 1813
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 1:26 am
How about this... Paralisis is a fearsome thing, but maybe the mage needs to concentrate heavily on it to keep the character paralised. How about, a mage can only cast paralisis on 1 character at a single time. If it cast one character A then on character B, character A is freed from the tangly vines because the mage loses concentration on it.
This will help make it more even since a single warrior will fear mages, but two, three or four will be able to handle a single mage.
This will help make it more even since a single warrior will fear mages, but two, three or four will be able to handle a single mage.