Page 3 of 3

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:26 pm
by Fooser
Irania wrote:All in favour of now recapping the long and complicated line of Fooser?
This is very important, and could lead to the finding of the true heir to the Trollsbane crown. Just about every elf on the island is an offspring of Fooser (regardless of age), so I guess we just need to find the eldest child out of all of them.

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:38 pm
by Taliss Kazzxs
Damien is a child of the Fooser!

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:43 pm
by Alexander Rothman
Aha!

Everyone forgot the elder brother of Stephen, Alexander Rothman, Count of Adamar?

So nice to be missed.

Say what you want about the Rothman's, but their secrets are their own and not up for debate. Jen, your character was just one in a long line of women Stephen loved. I am sure there are many heirs to the Rothman legacy still awaiting discovery.

Get over it, or I'll come back to Gobaith, PG like hell and wipe the streets with your bloody carcass!

IMHO........STFU!
((Lock thread now please))

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:27 pm
by Salathe

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:28 am
by Lrmy
Salathe wrote:vote no for rothman!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Rothman
I remember Sam posting a link to Steve Rothman's web page a while back. I laughed so hard when I read that.


Anyone remember Fooser John? :D

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 7:15 am
by Jaren
There is no rule that disallows one player from making a relative of another player's character. So what they are doing is within the rules of this game.

However wether or not it is right, insultive, lame, and unoriginal is another issue.

I personally believe it is pretty low to carry one character's name to gain ingame wealth or fame, at least without getting the original player's expressed permission.

But oh well, it is perfectly within everyone else's roleplay ability and right to simply deny these new Rothmans their lineage. Especially if the originating character's established background story shows that they could never exist.

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:04 am
by Nitram
You forgot "biological impossible", Jaren.

Anyway, that discussion come to an end now.
I propose next time the players of our new group of Rothmans think a little before they drop in characters with such relations to other characters.

Nitram