Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 12:15 am
I hope I get a warning first then, because in off-topic. Daaayum, I can't help myself at times. 
Online RPG
https://illarion.org/community/forums/
Who has a problem with the way Samantha is played? wait we better start a new topic...i think 250 pages might be a max in a topic.Samantha Meryadeles wrote:We told you guys now the tenth time that he broke 2 rules, 2! Can you please start listening and don't ignore that facts? He HAS broke TWO rules of the game, AND, added to that, he MOCKED the GM's, he tried to make fool out of them.
And that AFTER he has a known past of doing wrong things. after being already punished often in the past.
Just because he does good roleplay, what is really a matter of opinion, i have many problems with his way of roleplay, doesnt mean he can allow himself again and again rulebreaks and wrong doings and never gets a serious punishment for that.
We can't make a difference by that based on how much you like someone or if he done more good or bad. You will be judged just based on what you did leading to the punishment or trial, not who you are.
Wait, I must have blacked out or something, please show me where I have insulted youSamantha Meryadeles wrote:Azuros
I was joking im not enough of a (female dog) to do that. Even to you.Samantha Meryadeles wrote:Azuros, Stephen, Retlak, Liles and co insulted me far more, just take Retlaks "stop living" thing meaning he wishes me death. All Nitram did was saying he hasnt thought, where he was right, since he hasn'T read what was written and thought about it.
So stop saying he insulted him when they did stuff much more terrible
Lrmy, do that. You have my allowness. It will be interesting to see what comes up. Go, start the topic in the offtopic area, i give you my full allowness to do so!
Sounds good.Ku 'Agor wrote:Wow, three pages of ranting and pointing fingers!!
I'm so glad we all jumped to conclusions and started a catfight instead of doing something productive!
While we are at it, let's all just take our thumbs and shove them right up our asses, seeing as we have nothing better to do!
This is nothing, remember the thread we had in the off topic?Ku 'Agor wrote:Wow, three pages of ranting and pointing fingers!!
I'm so glad we all jumped to conclusions and started a catfight instead of doing something productive!
While we are at it, let's all just take our thumbs and shove them right up our asses, seeing as we have nothing better to do!
Retlak wrote:Patric is not posting, i hope he died.
Right about now. Latex gloves and vaseline, anyone?Lance Thunnigan wrote:Sounds good.
When do we start?
Nope.Azuros wrote: This is nothing, remember the thread we had in the off topic?
It looks like the gms are banning together..your wrong on that post damien***, most of it anyways.Damien wrote:Please all remind this :
GM's don't serve single players or groups of players, but the whole community.
If a player acts immature, breaks or repeatedly bends the rules necessary for a working community, or tries to fool a GM by not taking any of the GMs actions for serious, this player clearly damages the community. It is the clear goal of a GM to avoid such damage and thus, a player demonstrating not having the necessary self-discipline or maturity has to be removed or to be "raised" by punishments.
For trying to fool a GM who seriously wants to talk to you, you will definitely get banned quickly. Making it worse afterwards by the breaking of some rules and demonstrating that you basically don't care for those will seriously get you banned until you really have improved.
In case of a player who did cause trouble again and again, and who tried to fool the staff several times in the past, you can be sure that the staff will really consider permanent measurements.
If a GM bans a player fooling/ignoring him ingame, that's absolutely no abuse and a totally logical reaction.
Basically, all staff members who already spoke on the related topic on the staff boards support this ban.
You can be assured that the staff will not act "bitchy", nor delete player characters / accounts out of moods since such decisions are done by not one staff member, but by several.
Before taking a position, it is always good to hear both sides of the story.
Please think before posting, and don't get carried away into breaking rules yourself, it is not good for anyone if one is banned because someone else acted stupid towards a GM.
Dinner guest? You didn't call me.The Returner wrote:Damien <3
No.. he pretty much hit it on the head..It looks like the gms are banning together..your wrong on that post damien***, most of it anyways.
He made a typo.. -.oSamantha Meryadeles wrote:Markous?!
your alive, damn. Sorry for not reading your post.Samantha Meryadeles wrote:Damien is right. The Staff says the desicion is right, many players wrote the desicion is right and okay. But no, still peoples ignore all facts, ignore all gm desicions, ignore all the players who agree with them, and still say we are all wrong. nice how a few players say all the gm's and many players are wrong, but they are right.