Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 5:59 am
You are simply put, wrong.Cain Freemont wrote: You are truly dim to the subject I am speaking of. Surrounding a town with walls is nothing like wearing armour. Wearing armour does not center a large group of people into one collective area so they may easily be slaughtered. Wearing armour actually protects the body. These walls only hold in the people of town from dangers outside it, right? Wrong. These walls only make people fear what is on the outside, when really whatever is out there could EASILY enter by killing a few guards. It has been done before, I have seen the slain bodies of many town guards.
The walls protect no one when rot worms and ogres seem to enter the perimeters rather simply. The walls protect no one when assassins sneak in, slaughter guards, and sneak back out. The walls protect no one when an opposing force really wishes to enter.
Your logic is based on saying that wearing shirts alone is useless on a cold night, so therefore we shouldn't wear shirts at all, when in fact combining them with and coats and shirts would actually help keep us warm.
Is simple stupidity if anyone expects a wall to magically keep out all dangers and replace the use of men and weapons, and nobody ever said that would be the case. They are all components meant to be used together. A wall could only make our defenses better in most situations even if not by as much in some others, or please tell me why any castle or fort in the world has walls, when all the drawbacks you mentioned could apply equally to them as well?
When a knight puts on a big heavy platemail to battle, I highly doubt he is thinking of running way.
We are on an ISLAND. This "collective" area you speak of is what we call "home", Cain Freemont.
Where will we run too if we have to give up our homes? Push ourselves into the home of the dwarves and hobbits? Or the criminal sanctity of Notherot or Callahorn?
We obviously value our home here very much, or we would have left the troubles of the island long ago. For us to flee would be a situation as desperate as half the town being dead already.
We wouldn't be running away unless you had some crazy idea that we were losing so badly it would be necessary to run away, and then somehow a few hours later it would be safe to go back into town. This doesn't happen in real life here. This only happens in an imaginary fantasy world.
You like to blame all your troubles on some entity called "Lyrenzia", that much I can tell. But why don't you answer my question first and name "who" exactly are the "scum" and tell me how can such scum stay in power when those that give them the power are ordinary people with the same needs as you and me, hmm?Cain Freemont wrote: No, I never said it was honourable to spill the blood of citizens. You are simply adding your own words. Yes, I say Lyrenzia does not care about its people. When a government remains neutral without knowing its citizens by name and face, it does not care about its people. When a government can so easily cast aside any member of its community that it wishes, it does not care about its people. Of course I hate Lyrenzia. And yet, no one has bothered to ask why. Maybe because they don't care? Well, I'll tell you why anyway. Lyrenzia destroyed the true Troll's Bane long ago, when it first forced its way into power. By forcing the other guilds to become a part of the Foundation or lose power, Lyrenzia damned Troll's Bane and everything and everyone in her borders. I have lived in these lands longer than the dream of Lyrenzia has even existed, yet did anyone ask my opinion about such a government? No. Did anyone ask my friends, whom have also been living here longer than Lyrenzia has existed? No. You Lyrenzia scum just took it all for yourselves. You claimed ownership of the land. How disgusting. You say I never provide reasons or proof, well that is because Lyrenzia removes all of its shady history from the walls. I have seen many torn up parchments regarding Lyrenzia. I know this to be true. Anyone who does any extensive research on the matter would know this.
Yes. Yes is has, all the time.Cain Freemont wrote: Has anyone in the Lyrenzia Foundation EVER asked how townsfolk actually feel about the Foundation? Has Lyrenzia ever conducted a survey of how well the Foundation is run? If you want to see where your loyalties truly lie, do so. Show that you give a damn what happens to the people. SHOW the people that you are not a bunch of worthless, greedy, selfish sacks of scum.
Actions speak louder than words. Hell, maybe you will even get an apology from me if you manage to prove me wrong.
The Grey Rose should feel great about Lennier's work, or why do they not replace him?
The halflings should feel great about Crosis's work, or why do they not choose another leader?
The dwarves should feel great about Tialdin's work, or why do they follow such a king?
The common folk should feel great about the work of their public councilors which they elected, or why did they elect him/her? Why do they not ask him/her replaced? Or they can simply elect other people after 3 months?
Everything that "Lyrenzia" does, is the result of the desires of the people who chose the representitives to do it. So if the representitives are not doing what they want, why do they choose them and not someone else? Or what do those "greedy worthless scum" as you put it, have to gain when the money for walls and guards are coming out of their pockets?
But do you actually care enough to gather nominees who will represent the interests of you and your friends? No of course not. You just want to complain and blame "Lyrenzia" when bad things happen, because it's so much easier to blame some entity that you can't put a single face on.