Illarion.org

I don't know why I still talk against you Garett, as it is worse than talking against a wall.

Ever thought of the idea that Tialdin might have logged on to attend an ANNOUNCED quest that WOULD HAVE started at the same time?

Please, if Stephen twists everything around so it suits his side, so be it, he's a prick to talk nicely about him, but if you as the PO have to rely on the same cheap tricks I'm more than disappointed, I'm flat angered and would call that bullshitting.

I didn't wanted to mention it, but also some of your crew complained OOC about all the dwarves showing up after you took the town and assumed we would've called everyone together on MSN or other IM-programs.

In fact all these dwarves wanted to celebrate the event I announced and instead half of them didnt get what was going on and why there were all those humans in their town.

And now to talk with Nitrams words, stfu, kthx

Thurbert, tho I would sometimes take your words for wisdom, we are not talking about Stephen attacking Silverbrand.

it was with jacob kent and his bandit crew when they needed a home.
And no, there was no event the day of the attack

Maybe you should stop behaving like childs and complaining about each other...the things have already happened...learn from your mistakes and go back to topic now

Between Nitram and Garrett, you have managed to derail this thread faster than placing a dead walrus on the tracks.....congratulations!

more on topic, though i usually dont like online translators because of their attrocious grammar, they give you a rough idea of what the posts are about, so they come in handy





btw faffara, i love that line ^^

someone please close this topic.. thank you

Sorry this took so long to post but Garret is correct. My character Gishmel didn't help kill the female dwarf because Garret's character did to fast. The other dwarf understood us and told us he would translate and spoke to her in German. If you think Garret did wrong then you are ignorent of the incodent.

Not only is what Gort is saying true, but, being that I was the GM who protested the ban successfully, I might be able to enlighten further.

The truth of the matter is the second dwarf, who "did not know English" was a player who knew English playing a dwarf who doesn't speak the "new tongue" for whatever reason.

That being said, both of the "victims" knew English.

The fact that the ban was protested against and the majority of the GM's agreed it was unjustified (and this was when we had a full GM staff) should be enough for everyone to know that there was no breaking of the rules.

Amen.