Page 2 of 2

Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:46 am
by Garett Gwenour
So why do you follow Captain Revlen so? He was appointed by myself and no other, before that he was no longer even a guard. So once more, why do you choose to follow a captain but not the man whom appointed him?

Stephen Rothman
Warrior of Malachin
Governor of Trolls Bane

Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:48 am
by Taylor
Because i have enough Honor to be loyal to the true captain. and not his replacement or appointer. I swore to follow Revlen, and that is what i will do.

T.W.
The Lone Wolf

Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:52 am
by Garett Gwenour
I was not aware the town guards swore to be loyal to one and only one person. As far as I was aware the guards were loyal to the town, ensuring to keep it safe, not to argue over power and try to undermine current guards because of different beliefs.

Stephen Rothman
Warrior of Malachin
Governor of Trolls Bane

Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:55 am
by Taylor
As far as I know. I still do that duty. And I always shall. But my loyalties are to Revlen and the Citizens. You should just stop writing before you incriminate yourself. Last i saw you cared more about your goverment then the town.

If you wish to ban me from town for my loyalties to Revlen and not you, by all means do so. It will simply be retracted later on in your foolishness. I am, and always will be, Loyal to revlen and the Citizens that wish my help. But never will i be loyal to you.

T.W.
The Lone Wolf

Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:57 am
by Garett Gwenour
I do not recall ever saying the Government was seperate from the citizenry. If such is the case, does that not mean you are loyal to the government?

Stephen Rothman
Governor of Trolls Bane
Warrior of Malachin

Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:58 am
by Taylor
There are no citizens within the governement. Just Arameh, Orren, and yourself. I see none of the citizens. And as I said, I will never be loyal to you, Read before you reply you nimwit.

T.W.
The Lone Wolf

Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 10:00 am
by Garett Gwenour
How are we not citizens of a city we live in? Keep in mind the entire government includes Allen, the tax collector and the rest of the town guard and knighthood. (Inwhich case Revlen is apart of the government, do you stay loyal to the government then?)

Stephen Rothman
Warrior of Malachin
Governor of Trolls Bane

Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 10:06 am
by Taylor
I have already said, I am loyal to REVLEN, not the government. Whatever he wishes i will do. Not what government he is a part of tells me what to do. Post something this stupid again and you will not get a reply from me.

T.W.
Taylor Windslasher

Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 10:09 am
by Garett Gwenour
So you will follow Revlen unquestioningly, is this not what you have accused those in the current guard and Knighthood, (in a very condecending way), do with me? Is this not hypocrisy?

Stephen Rothman
Warrior of Malachin
Governor of Trolls Bane

Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 11:10 am
by Ereaes
Taylor be still, tis no point bickering apon an open wall. I see many problems are yet to be resolved. I will do what i can when i show myself to you.

Revlen

Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:46 pm
by AlexRose
Garett Gwenour wrote:
Taylor wrote:Silas's ban has no ground.

Taylor Windslasher
The Lone Wolf
I would like to know why you think the High Knight of the Trolls Bane knighthood does not have the power to ban.

Stephen Rothman
Warrior of Malachin
Governor of Trolls Bane
Yes he does have the power to ban but Silas's ban still has no ground.

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:28 am
by Ronazin
Mr. Rothman and Mr. Windslasher I must say that I respect you both but you're acting quite chidish. You two managed to turn a parchent about what seems to be an inappropriate ban to wether the the goverment are considered citizens and so on. If you shall bicker do it privately because openly, you're making yourselves look like idiots.

In the case of Silas, I believe Mr.Windslasher meant by "Having no ground to ban Silas" Was that Arameh did not see the entire incident therefore he shouldnt have banned Silas purely on what he thought was right. So the ban should be removed, Arameh only needs to give a simple apology and that should be that.

unsigned

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:46 am
by Arameh
The ban has been made to its end, there will be no apology since I HAVE seen him using offensive spells in town.
_____________________
Arameh,
High Knight of Kallahorn

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:59 am
by Ronazin
If you mean he's used magic in town before then that is something to ban him for, especially if it's for amusements sake, but in this case it was used in defence from another person. To me there should never have been a ban at all. But thats only what I think. I am ceasing my voice on this topic.

Unsigned

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:05 am
by Arameh
You werent there, he has casted spells for amusement plenty of times, and he wasnt 'attacked' at all before he casted, not physically. Stop posting of things you dont have a clue about, you are wasting the board.
________________________
Arameh,
High Knight of Kallahorn