Page 1 of 1

A Sham of a trial

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 7:05 am
by Applesauce
I attended the Ruinwick trial of the two Kings. They were not in court but had some one there to speak for them. I actually think that someone tried, but it was obvious the court was already decided. As I was escorted out of the court for trying to speak, there was no doubt about the vote. There is a reasonable doubt concerning the defendants , but that court will never see it. Their verdict cant count because of the way they held court, and because their verdict was pre-determined.

Craig Winzer

Re: A Sham of a trial

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:30 am
by BjarsTale
A parchment is pinned under it

Meh show dis stompeh whub it means ta support da Kings from Letma.

Dis was ta much fer Krukk, supportin dem and den run around like he nub done anehthin bad.
Speakin' with him wasnt a success and meh nub can let him wanderin' around so easily. So meh clear his mind with Bragons fire.

~Krukk Krakash Blacktusk

Defender of the Don's enemies

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 12:21 pm
by S'rrt
How these men manage to gain supporters after their killings, extortions and collaboration with malicious forces, I do not know. It seems all too easy for newcomers to stick to their first impressions of ongoing events instead of replacing their ignorance with knowledge, especially when they have not had to endure the violence of the self-proclaimed "kings".

If this "Craig" is a Galmairian, it begs the question: how would the Don himself consider one who, while enjoying the benefits of living in his town, seemingly defends those who betrayed him and now have an active campaign against him?

~~ Baron S'rrt K'shire,
Cadomyr's ambassador to Galmair