Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Everything about Illarion that fits nowhere else. / Alles über Illarion was inhaltlich in kein anderes Board passt.

Moderator: Gamemasters

User avatar
Q-wert
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 10:13 am
Contact:

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by Q-wert »

LucyP wrote:I don't understand something. I get that some people are unhappy about how magical gems are distributed or found. But why do they not trade what they do have with others when asked? My character has been struggling for months, in game months to try and find anyone to trade with. Today, at the fair, finally someone is willing to trade for one latent. Only one. At this rate it will take many years to get a set together. And all she wants is a set of limited stones. This is beyond frustrating and, for a fighter character, about to make her swim off to other shores.

I don't think it is that gems aren't being found or given at tax time, is it that people just refuse to trade? Why are the stones of your own town so important to hold onto?
The reason why no one wishes to trade theirs for Galmarian ones is simple. There are a lot of Galmarian stones produced in total, due to the recent shift of population towards Galmair (which happened for reasons this thread might explain). While the gem output is somewhat equal for all towns per person (even a little higher for the non-Galmarians, I dare say), there are way more Galmarian stones on the market than those of the other settlements.

In the end that is just one of the balancing features to encourage playing in underpopulated towns.
LucyP
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:24 am

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by LucyP »

People not willing to trade is stagnating the game. Frustrating to players. Going to be a big issue if it is not already.
User avatar
GolfLima
Posts: 1472
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:06 pm
Location: hier und dort

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by GolfLima »

Erstens: Galmair scheint seit einiger Zeit einen recht großen Ausstoß an mag. Steinen zu haben
First: seems that Galmair has a big output of magical gems

Zweitens: es werden eine Menge an magischen Obsidianen beim Bergbau gefunden
Second: there will be found a lot of magical obsidians when mining

:arrow: damit wird man nur schwer jemand finden, der diese Steine zum Tausch benötigt
:arrow: so you will hardly find somebody who needs this kind of stones
User avatar
Matron
Posts: 1622
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 2:12 pm

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by Matron »

Galmairians could just donate to other towns to increase their gem-output.
LucyP
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:24 am

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by LucyP »

As posted in another thread, nearly no magical stones found while gathering wood (one found in learning 67 levels). Is it different or are there just so many more stones gathered compared to wood?
User avatar
CJK
Developer
Posts: 970
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:58 pm
Location: cjk@illarion.org

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by CJK »

LucyP wrote:As posted in another thread, nearly no magical stones found while gathering wood (one found in learning 67 levels). Is it different or are there just so many more stones gathered compared to wood?
All magical gems have a 0.025% (1/4000) drop rate when gathering. It's the same as pure elements.

Also, for those that don't know which crafts drop what:

Egg gathering: Obsidian
Honey gathering: Emerald
Milking: Topaz
Farming: Ruby
Fruit gathering: Ruby
Mining: Obsidian
Sand digging: Topaz
Clay digging: Amethyst
Herb gathering: Sapphire
Fishing: Sapphire
Woolcutting: Amethyst
Woodcutting: Emerald (Thanks Caswir for pointing out this one. I overlooked it.)
Last edited by CJK on Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Alyssa El'anir
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 11:08 pm

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by Alyssa El'anir »

ltgmkay wrote: Milking: Topaz
That's... Disturbing. :shock:
User avatar
GolfLima
Posts: 1472
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:06 pm
Location: hier und dort

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by GolfLima »

ltgmkay wrote:Woolcutting: Amethyst
:arrow: has this changed?
last time i got an magical gem it was an emerald
User avatar
Caswir
Posts: 549
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 6:10 am
Location: 🝑 🝒 🜤 🜟

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by Caswir »

Woodcutting is emerald ;)
User avatar
CJK
Developer
Posts: 970
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:58 pm
Location: cjk@illarion.org

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by CJK »

GolfLima wrote:
ltgmkay wrote:Woolcutting: Amethyst
:arrow: has this changed?
last time i got an magical gem it was an emerald
I just pulled it straight from the scripts. Not sure if this is the way it had been or not.
User avatar
Mephistopheles
Posts: 1059
Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2013 10:04 pm
Location: Murica

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by Mephistopheles »

Metagaming, they trade with friends to make each others groups or organizations stronger. Not everyone does this, but that is how a lot of gem trading is worked out.

Try events like trainings and such. People are usually willing to trade then.
LucyP
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:24 am

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by LucyP »

Mephistopheles wrote:Metagaming, they trade with friends to make each others groups or organizations stronger. Not everyone does this, but that is how a lot of gem trading is worked out.

Try events like trainings and such. People are usually willing to trade then.
aka: game stagnation, leading to new POs not being happy because new characters can't succeed at a reasonable pace or at all. As I said, it isn't even like Qoa is looking for large magic gems, just level 2. It's ridiculous. Truly. Everyone says they don't need what she has and nobody cares about Qoa's needs.
Last edited by LucyP on Mon Nov 16, 2015 7:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fooser
Posts: 4725
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2002 2:25 pm

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by Fooser »

That's the reality we live in when a tiny portion of players control a large portion of game functionality.
LucyP
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:24 am

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by LucyP »

Fooser wrote:That's the reality we live in when a tiny portion of players control a large portion of game functionality.
And does this go back to number of player issue or is there a way to fix this problem?
User avatar
Q-wert
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 10:13 am
Contact:

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by Q-wert »

Pro tip regarding gems: Change Settlements
Suddenly there will be way more people wanting to trade with you than you have gems for. Although your character preferring trade with those close to her will be shunned as metagaming by some American clique elitists. I myself consider it rather in character to be careful who to arm with powerful magical stones, so maybe befriending some foreigners might be a good first step if changing Realm is too extreme?

I know I am repeating myself, but: As of now, there are simply too few Cadomyrian and Runewickian stones to go around, due to a population imbalance caused by a number of reasons discussed in this thread. In the end the complained result is the intended balancing mechanism of the gem system: Those playing in underpopulated settlements are rewarded.

Pro tip regarding game functionality: Become a developer.
User avatar
CJK
Developer
Posts: 970
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:58 pm
Location: cjk@illarion.org

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by CJK »

Q-wert wrote:
Pro tip regarding game functionality: Become a developer.

There's always space for more volunteers! :wink:

Also, seriously, if people ever feel "in the dark" about the actual mechanics of game functionality and feel like more experienced players or people who "can read scripts" have an unfair advantage over them, shoot me a PM. I'm always very happy to explain anything I can about the system.
Fooser
Posts: 4725
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2002 2:25 pm

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by Fooser »

LucyP wrote:
Fooser wrote:That's the reality we live in when a tiny portion of players control a large portion of game functionality.
And does this go back to number of player issue or is there a way to fix this problem?
Also consider that not too long ago they added gem socketing to armor which increased demand while supply remained the same. Gemming went from 1 slot to 7 slots overnight. That makes this a period of hording and could take some time to balance out.
User avatar
Mephistopheles
Posts: 1059
Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2013 10:04 pm
Location: Murica

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by Mephistopheles »

^indeed

My char prefers to get charismatic people to do the trading for him, it doesn't get much but it takes time to get gem sets, I've had my char for over a year to gather the amount he has now, even passing on sets to closely knit chars involved with mine. Also he's deemed as an unsavory type to the people he needs to trade with, so trading through a middleman is kind of necessary.

Building a new illarion char to meet your end goal takes time no matter what the destination is. Be it warrior or craftter or in between.
User avatar
Jupiter
Developer
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 11:23 am

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by Jupiter »

The gem system was designed to keep you busy for forever. That is intended. Just wait until some crazy lizard donates again 1000 gold coins in Cadomyr or when tne Runewickians have a secret big donation month (It's secret, so shhh). Then you will have chances to trade. Don't judge this after some weeks. Month, years are the more appropriate time span.
LucyP
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:24 am

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by LucyP »

So is obtaining a level 2 gem set after 5 in game months of trying unrealistic for a new character? Having only 2 of the stones, those of her city, is very demotivating. Ready to stop playing all together.

And what does this say to Illarion's chances to build it's player base?
User avatar
Evie
Developer
Posts: 1210
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 6:55 pm
Location: on a mana stream

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by Evie »

For the record, Galmair is not the most populated because of Developer favoritism it is because of how the town is run. The other two towns are controlled by small select groups. Most Galmarians actually moved from one or the other two towns because of political , in-game and in-character reasons.
User avatar
CJK
Developer
Posts: 970
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:58 pm
Location: cjk@illarion.org

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by CJK »

LucyP wrote:So is obtaining a level 2 gem set after 5 in game months of trying unrealistic for a new character? Having only 2 of the stones, those of her city, is very demotivating. Ready to stop playing all together.

And what does this say to Illarion's chances to build it's player base?

What is Qoa's rank in Galmair? Also, does she have what seems to be a significant amount of gold?

The tax system will give out very few gems if you are low in rank and/or have very little money to be taxed. This prevented my main from ever really acquiring a lot of gems just because I wasn't interested in the ranks.
Fooser
Posts: 4725
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2002 2:25 pm

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by Fooser »

Proposals to try to alleviate perceived issues:
-Lower the amount of faction needed for each rank by a mild amount
-Have a percentage chance (33%?) that a person can get a gem color not of their town each tax day
LucyP
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:24 am

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by LucyP »

ltgmkay wrote:
LucyP wrote:So is obtaining a level 2 gem set after 5 in game months of trying unrealistic for a new character? Having only 2 of the stones, those of her city, is very demotivating. Ready to stop playing all together.

And what does this say to Illarion's chances to build it's player base?

What is Qoa's rank in Galmair? Also, does she have what seems to be a significant amount of gold?

The tax system will give out very few gems if you are low in rank and/or have very little money to be taxed. This prevented my main from ever really acquiring a lot of gems just because I wasn't interested in the ranks.
Don't see how it matters. Not her own town's gems she needs and she can't find anyone to trade her own town's gems with to get the others. This is the issue I have been trying to discuss here.
LucyP
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:24 am

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by LucyP »

Fooser wrote:Proposals to try to alleviate perceived issues:
-Lower the amount of faction needed for each rank by a mild amount
-Have a percentage chance (33%?) that a person can get a gem color not of their town each tax day
I don't see rank as being an issue.

I was thinking the magical gem NPCs could just trade gem for gem. Perhaps even limit the number of trades allowed per month or something. But some form of incentive is needed to help our newer POs as right now, it is just too dang much work and, quite frankly, not worth the effort. If a few are going to hold all the power and control of some gems, which are needed, with no way for everyone to access, then there is no way to play. End of game.
Fooser
Posts: 4725
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2002 2:25 pm

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by Fooser »

LucyP wrote:
Fooser wrote:Proposals to try to alleviate perceived issues:
-Lower the amount of faction needed for each rank by a mild amount
-Have a percentage chance (33%?) that a person can get a gem color not of their town each tax day
I don't see rank as being an issue.

I was thinking the magical gem NPCs could just trade gem for gem. Perhaps even limit the number of trades allowed per month or something. But some form of incentive is needed to help our newer POs as right now, it is just too dang much work and, quite frankly, not worth the effort. If a few are going to hold all the power and control of some gems, which are needed, with no way for everyone to access, then there is no way to play. End of game.
The two would have to be done together. More rank = more gem output. Then there'd be a chance added on top of that for them to be of a different type than just the usual 2 of a certain town.
User avatar
CJK
Developer
Posts: 970
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:58 pm
Location: cjk@illarion.org

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by CJK »

  • Nobody needs gems to do anything. They just give a boost to your weapons and armor. The weapon boost isn't even very big at all. Until higher levels, these probably will make no difference for Qoa. I ran my main, Jon, for months before completing a gem set. It was fine.
  • The purpose of splitting gems up is to balance towns and to encourage trade. What has Qoa done to attempt to trade these gems? Forum threads? Seeking out crafters who don't need theirs and might trade them for gold? Attending meeting days in Cado/Runewick and asking to trade?
  • Letting players exchange gems with an NPC kind of kills the balance. It actually would make Galmair OP.
  • If Galmair gems have a high market quantity and Runewick gems have a very low one, then the Runewick gems are inherently more valuable by supply and demand. You can't try to trade at a 1:1 ratio there, so you need more of your own town's gems to get what you want. Which would require gold and rank.
  • Changing major parts of important game mechanics (gem distribution is a big deal) to suit temporary in game situations is not really worth developer time. We would have to keep adjusting these things all the time, and ultimately may never address the underlying issue. Also, people only have so much time to give.
User avatar
Vern Kron
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 10:20 pm

Re: Galmair is op: A Rant on Developer Favouritism

Post by Vern Kron »

LucyP wrote:
Fooser wrote:Proposals to try to alleviate perceived issues:
-Lower the amount of faction needed for each rank by a mild amount
-Have a percentage chance (33%?) that a person can get a gem color not of their town each tax day
I don't see rank as being an issue.

I was thinking the magical gem NPCs could just trade gem for gem. Perhaps even limit the number of trades allowed per month or something. But some form of incentive is needed to help our newer POs as right now, it is just too dang much work and, quite frankly, not worth the effort. If a few are going to hold all the power and control of some gems, which are needed, with no way for everyone to access, then there is no way to play. End of game.
As it currently stands, you actually don't need gems in any way to play the game. Like, at all. Gems are 'bonus'. I am not currently aware of Qoa's status when it comes to fighting skills, or defensive skills, but unless she is slated for high end combat skills and attributes, the endeavor still won't make her the top of the class. Gems are more of an important deal when your character has reached a point that they cannot progress in other ways.

If you want to make your characters goal to have a full set of rank 2 gems, that is fine. Realize that this is not something that will be done in a matter of weeks. And I know you are making the claim that 'my character has been around for IG months' but in reality that isn't much time at all. In comparison, the skill system is about the same as most mmo's although they require sheer time IG rather than the typical grinding one may expect. The fighting equipment in game, if we are honest, most people can get to the point that they have access to most end-tier goods, within their first few days of playing. They become friendly with the right person, and the job is done. Should it be that way? No. But is it? Yes.

Gems are the way in which power differences occur. When you start out, you don't get many gems. If you don't actively work to improve your rank in the town, you do not get as many gems. If you don't have much money to go into the taxes, you don't get many gems.

Gems are not only a bonus to your equipment, but to an extent, it can also be shown how involved and dedicated that character has been and the connections made. I have played for a year in the new game: I have come across ONE, count it, ONE magical ruby. However, other gems are more plentiful for my character. Your character simply does not have the resources, or time, or the rank, to have gathered these bonus points yet. As you move through the game, more opportunities arise.

People generally trade with characters they trust and think 'if I give this person a gem, will this come back to haunt me later?' If that answer is yes, for any reason, then they will be rejected in the trade offer.
Post Reply