Read the news! / Lest die News!

Post by **Nitram** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:01 pm

I know just a few do but this time everyone should. Read the news on the homepage!

----

Ich weis das es nur ein paar wenige tun, aber diesesmal sollten es all. Lest die Neuigkeiten auf der Homepage!

Alsaya · Post by **Alsaya** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:02 pm

Im Zuge der neuen Regeln, haben wir nun auch neue Regeln bezüglich Gilden. Diese sind ausgereifter und vorallem umfassender. Aus diesem Grund werden alle Gilden gebeten die neuen Regeln durchzulesen und das erfoderliche Konzept an einen GM zu schicken. Sollte das Konzept nicht binnen einer Woche bei dem GM Team eingetroffen sein, gilt die Gilde als inaktiv, der zugehörige Thread im Gildenboard wird geschlossen und das Recht auf eventuelles Eigentum ingame verfällt.

Zur Zeit aktive GMs sind:

Arien Edhel
Zak
Vaun
Mesha
Naerwyn
Alsaya

-------------------------------------------

With the new rules, we also have now new rules concerning guilds. These are fully developed and especially more comprehensive. Due to this, we ask every guild to read those new rules and to send the needed concept to a GM. Should the concept not arrive the GM Team within one week, the guild is counted as inactive, the thread in the guildboard will be closed and the right on any property ingame expires.

Active GMs right now are:

Arien Edhel
Zak
Vaun
Mesha
Naerwyn
Alsaya

AlexRose · Post by **AlexRose** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:03 pm

:/

I wish you wouldn't destroy stuff

Even if it isn't being used, it's still more interesting to have on the map than a featureless field of green, and at least it adds some history to the island and acts as a momento. Adding diversity and history encourages roleplay.

rakust dorenstkzul · Post by **rakust dorenstkzul** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:28 pm

Call me nitpicky, but that rule you guys made about Pregnancy probation isn't on those lists.

Can i take it as though the rule's temporary?

Alexander Knight · Post by **Alexander Knight** » Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:56 am

I agree... but some places you guys missed out.... Goldberg Kallahorn Caelum ((Even though you chased people out of goldberg with a crazy dwarf and golem))

Mesha · Post by **Mesha** » Fri Nov 13, 2009 10:06 am

Alexander Knight wrote:I agree... but some places you guys missed out.... Goldberg Kallahorn Caelum ((Even though you chased people out of goldberg with a crazy dwarf and golem))

What does this have to do with the rules?

Alexander Knight · Post by **Alexander Knight** » Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:44 am

Oh sorry i read it wrong, i thought you said IF the guild is inactive for more than a week then land will be taken

Sorry

Post by **Nitram** » Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:50 pm

The pregnancy rule got dropped again. In case its needed characters that play the pregnancy in a unfitting way, those will be handled one by one.

Nitram

Alexander Knight · Post by **Alexander Knight** » Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:35 pm

Nitram wrote:The pregnancy rule got dropped again. In case its needed characters that play the pregnancy in a unfitting way, those will be handled one by one.

Nitram

PMSL Samara wont be too happy. She had to have a miscarrage 2 days before her due date

Post by **Nitram** » Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:47 pm

So what? The rule was dropped NOW. It was valid before.

Nitram

1d20 · Post by **1d20** » Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:22 pm

Nitram will be pregnant and I will be its offspring.

Post by **CJK** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:30 am

I've got a question on that age rule... if you are already an active player in the community you don't particuarly care that someone is under 16, do you? otherwise I'm in trouble

rakust dorenstkzul · Post by **rakust dorenstkzul** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:37 am

ltgmkay wrote:I've got a question on that age rule... if you are already an active player in the community you don't particuarly care that someone is under 16, do you? otherwise I'm in trouble

I'm 12 and what is this

Aldan Vian · Post by **Aldan Vian** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:56 am

rakust dorenstkzul wrote:
ltgmkay wrote:I've got a question on that age rule... if you are already an active player in the community you don't particuarly care that someone is under 16, do you? otherwise I'm in trouble
I'm 12 and what is this

It says "recommended" age, and I think this has been around for a long time...

wolfsword · Post by **wolfsword** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:19 am

ltgmkay wrote:I've got a question on that age rule... if you are already an active player in the community you don't particuarly care that someone is under 16, do you? otherwise I'm in trouble

Nah, otherwise I wouldn't be here,

Started when I was twelve like Raku as well, o.O

Kranek · Post by **Kranek** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:22 am

it has been here since i started the game ages ago

AlexRose · Post by **AlexRose** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:49 pm

That's ancient. It was even there when I started. I thought the reason was due to the gore and sexual scenes and stuff, but apparently they're banned now too >_>. They also had a rule against watching TV while ingame

.

Damien · Post by **Damien** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:44 pm

It is not there because of gore and sexual stuff !
Please keep in mind:

The reason why this game is recommended for players above 16 is that a player has to be able to act somewhat mature in a roleplaying game like this one in order not to drive other players out of it ! (and usually get banned after doing so).

In short : the younger a player is, the higher the chance that he behaves childish or stupid. The more childish or stupid a player behaves, the likelier is the chance that another game (for example: www.hellokittyonline.com ) is suited much better for said player.

Llama · Post by **Llama** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:54 pm

Dude, its even free to play! Wish i had the time to try it

Damien · Post by **Damien** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:55 pm

...n00b

Post by **CJK** » Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:15 pm

heh so THAT is why it is good to read the rules when you join...

although I don't think that it is exactly true to expect everyone under 16 to be immature... or so i've been told

Llama · Post by **Llama** » Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:57 pm

ltgmkay wrote:heh so THAT is why it is good to read the rules when you join... although I don't think that it is exactly true to expect everyone under 16 to be immature... or so i've been told

Nor is it true to expect everyone over 16 to be mature. We all like to think that there is some exquisite_correlation between the two, but it seems this is not the case.

Arvemor · Post by **Arvemor** » Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:05 am

Well written! Bravo!

AlexRose · Post by **AlexRose** » Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:08 am

Arvemor · Post by **Arvemor** » Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:16 am

Lol, sorry Alex, I just thought it was funny. *opens his arms for a hug* Still friends?

1d20 · Post by **1d20** » Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:00 am

Arvemor wrote:*opens his arms for a hug*

I'm his boyfriend and I get jealous.

Tanistian_Kanea · Post by **Tanistian_Kanea** » Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:31 am

ok. this may seem redundant buuuuttt i'm going to ask anyway.

for those of us who may not have read the rules within the last year or so.... what changes where made?

Vern Kron · Post by **Vern Kron** » Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:38 am

Just go by the current rules. The past rules, obviously, are not in effect any longer.

Arvemor · Post by **Arvemor** » Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:15 am

MoonDust wrote:
I'm his boyfriend and I get jealous.

*Bitchslaps Moondust*

XD

Ortrud · Post by **Ortrud** » Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:33 am

Eine genaueres Regelwerk finde ich sehr gut.
Aber ist es wirklich nötig, daß alle Gilder praktisch sofort ihr neues Konzept vorstellen?
Ich denke da sollte es einen zeitlich größeren Spielraum geben, es ist ja nicht so, daß alle Spieler
ständig Zeit haben.
Bitte überdenkt das mit der einen Woche nochmal.